핵심 요약
브라질 우파의 의회 기반 확대는 재정개혁 기회인 동시에 사법부와의 충돌 위험이라는 사설이다.
논증 분석
논리구조
-
대선 1차 투표뿐 아니라 의회와 주요 주에서의 PL 성과를 장기적인 정치 지형 변화의 근거로 든다.
-
지출 의무를 바꾸면 차입·금리 부담이 줄고 투자가 늘 수 있다고 보지만, 실제 긴축 의지가 부족하다는 반론을 제시한다.
-
아버지 사면과 판사 보복을 내건 공약을 근거로 제도적 견제 약화와 정치 양극화를 우려한다. 범죄 연루 의혹은 확정된 유죄 사실과 구분한다.
-
향후 대법관 교체 가능성과 의회·사법부 대치가 대통령의 선택에 달렸다고 본다. 10월 25일 결선 승자를 확정하지 않는다.
결론
사설의 우파 우세 전망은 선거 결과 자체가 아니다. 동반 기사와 이 사설의 대법관 탄핵 요건 표현이 달라, 법적 정족수를 이 자료만으로 확정하지 않는다. 제공된 published는 10월 7일이고 URL은 10월 6일이므로 둘 다 원래대로 보존했다.
토론 질문
강한 의회 다수는 재정개혁의 실행력을 높일까, 사법부 보복의 유인을 높일까? 두 경로를 구별할 초기 정책 신호는 무엇일까?
함께 읽기
The Bolsonaro comeback in Brazil
원문
The Bolsonaro clan promises to align with Donald Trump, and to attack democratic institutions
Photograph: Getty Images
FOR MOST of the past quarter of a century Brazil was dominated by the Workers’ Party (PT). A left-wing alliance of trade-unionists, progressive Catholics and academics built a large welfare state and defined Latin America’s version of social democracy. That era is over. On October 4th the PT and its ageing leader, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, known as Lula, were trounced in the first round of Brazil’s general election by Flávio Bolsonaro and his Liberal Party (PL).
Betting markets give Flávio a strong chance of winning the run-off on October 25th. It is an astounding result for the scion of a right-wing dynasty whose patriarch, Jair, an ex-president, is under house arrest for an attempted coup. Only last year Jair was barred from office until 2060. His son has alleged connections to the criminal underworld. Despite that, Flávio narrowly fell short of winning outright.
Even if Flávio unexpectedly fails, the election is a triumph for Brazil’s MAGA -adjacent right—the latest in a wave of successes for right-wing parties in Latin America. The PL now has the most powerful congressional caucus since Brazil’s constitution was enacted in 1988. It is also the largest party in the three biggest states, São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro and Minas Gerais, which together generate more than half of Brazilian GDP.
The Bolsonaro clan is ecstatic. Jair’s ardently evangelical wife, two of his other sons and his brother all won seats in Congress. From February, when newly elected senators take their seats, the PL and allies will control the Senate and thus can rewrite laws. Expect them to boost business and to weaken protections for the environment. Some outsiders will warn against allowing more damage to the Amazon rainforest. Other outsiders, including America, will crave the opportunity to tap Brazil’s huge deposits of critical minerals, vital resources whose global supply is otherwise controlled largely by China.
This congressional strength means the PL has a rare opportunity to fix Brazil’s ruinous public finances. Rewriting the laws which impose high and growing levels of government spending would curb borrowing, bring down interest rates and prompt investment—boosting growth. It gives the Bolsonaros scope to create a glittering economic future for Brazil.
That would mean forgoing spending today, something for which the Bolsonaros have little appetite. The likelier outcome will be more polarised politics and pressure on Brazil’s vulnerable democratic institutions. The victors will exult in MAGA -style culture clashes. Two right-wing congressmen, Nikolas Ferreira and Lucas Pavanato, drew more votes than any candidates in Brazilian history; both are young social-media influencers who hate wokery as much as they love guns and God.
The Bolsonaros will seek vengeance. Flávio’s big campaign promise was to free his father. Many candidates for the Senate vowed to bring down the Supreme Court justices (some caught up in corruption scandals) who prosecuted Jair. “We don’t just want impeachment,” said Bia Kicis, a new PL senator, “we want removal, investigation and imprisonment.”
A Senate majority is needed in order to impeach a Supreme Court justice. A stand-off between the two powerful institutions could trigger a constitutional crisis. Justices who believe themselves to be defending democracy will deploy their extensive powers in order to remain in office. An emboldened Congress will attack the court. Whoever is the president will play a decisive role, not least because in the coming years he will probably get to replace four of the Supreme Court’s 11 justices.
However that fight ends, the outcome for Brazil is likely to be new grievances and deepening public cynicism. Brazilians have good reasons to reject the PT for its dead-end policies, its own corruption and the lack of fresh leadership. But they also have every reason to fear where that rejection now leads. ■
Subscribers to The Economist can sign up to our Opinion newsletter, which brings together the best of our leaders, columns, guest essays and reader correspondence.